Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49234/2017bail granted

Bhola @ Sunil Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49234 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -225 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Bhola @ Sunil Thakur son of Jagdish Thakur, Resident of VillageKhangoliya, Police Station- Vaishali in the District of Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 225 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of motorcycle.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that tough he is name in the F.I.R, however, nothing has been recovered from his possession and he has falsely been made accused in this case and has languishing in judicial custody since 10.08.2017 and has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts and also the fact that this is first offence of the petitioner, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49234 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 225 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T