Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68143 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2024 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1 .

SURAJ KUMAR SON OF BABO YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DHAMAUL, P.S. - HISUA, DISTRICT - NAWADA 2.

SADHU YADAV SON OF LATE DAWARIKA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DHAMAUL, P.S. - HISUA, DISTRICT - NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar , APP For the informant :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-10-2024 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the pre-arrest bail petition with respect to petitioner No. 2.

2. Permission is accorded.

3 . This bail petition of petitioner No. 2 is dismissed as withdrawn .

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner No. 1 and the State .

5 . Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 324, 341 , 379, 354(A), 504, 506, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68143 of 2024(2) dt.08-10-2024 2/3

6. As per prosecution case , on the alleged date and time of occurrence , when wife of informant and sons of informant were on road , in the meantime , all the F.I.R., named accused persons abused and assaulted them and accused persons threatened family members of informant with dire consequences. It is further alleged that this petitioner and others snatched gold chain from informant sides.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that specific accusation of assault is against other co-accused persons and so far as this petitioner is concerned, there is no allegation of any overt act is alleged against him. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in nature . Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

8 . Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail petition of the petitioner.

9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner No. 1 as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68143 of 2024(2) dt.08-10-2024 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM VI Nawada in connection with Hisua P.S. case No. 360 of 2024 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T