Amarjit Kumar @ Amarjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62846 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Amarjit Kumar @ Amarjeet Yadav Son of Lorik Yadav Resident of village - Koriyahi (Kariyaut), P.S.- Laukahi, Dist.- Madhubani, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case no.141 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under section 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. As per the prosecution case, on a raid being conducted 108 litres of country liquor was recovered from a hutment and the petitioner managed to escape.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot and no incriminating article was recovered from his possession. He has no concern with the seized liquor and also no connection with the hutment from which the liquor is said to have been recovered. The cause

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62846 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 of false implication of the petitioner is his antecedents. He undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, no incriminating article having been recovered from his possession and the petitioner having no concern with the hutment from which alleged recovery is said to have taken place, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case no.141 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T