Om Prakash Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62734 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Om Prakash Tiwari Son of Late Baleshwar Tiwari R/o Village - Auraiyan, P.S. - Shiv Sagar, Dist. - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 419, 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(D) of the IT Act.

3. The accused/petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 13.04.2025.

4. As per FIR, informant was cheated by named coaccused persons and others after sending nude videos and cheated informant on different occasions for amounts ranging between Rs. 4,000-40,000/-.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the alleged monetary transactions

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62734 of 2025(3) dt.20-11-2025 2/3 was not made in name of petitioner, whose name surfaced during the course of investigation on the basis of suspicion. In support of his submission, learned counsel drawn the statement qua monetary transactions which are available in paras 53 and 54 of the case diary, where none of the transactions appears to be made in name of this petitioner. While concluding argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is already completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as prima facie monetary transactions as alleged not appears found during course of investigation in the name of petitioner, coupled with the fact that investigation of this case is already completed, where petitioner being man of clean antecedent, remains in custody since 13.04.2025, accordingly, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025, on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62734 of 2025(3) dt.20-11-2025 3/3 Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-10, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C./Section 480(3) of BNSS. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T