Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47473/2017bail granted

Harish Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47473 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -88 Year- 2017 Thana -LODIPUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Harish Mandal, Son of Late Changuli Mandal, Resident of VillageBishanpur Jicho, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 22.5 litres of foreign liquor from the house of the petitioner. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and the house from which recovery has been made is joint house of petitioner and his family members. Further submission is that he is in custody for about three months having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47473 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Court, Excise Act, Bhagalpur, in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No. 88 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :- (1) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties in the jurisdiction of court concerned, (2) If involvement of the petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U