Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64702/2025dismissed

Chandan Kumar @ Babua @ Baua v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-17Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64702 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-545 Year-2022 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Chandan Kumar @ Babua @ Baua S/o Upendra Singh R/o Village - Ali Sarai, P.S - Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. Ii, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 545 of 2022 dated 19.10.2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that while he was going to his Sasural his motorcycle was looted on gun point.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has surfaced in the confessional statement of a co-accused. It is further submitted that no recovery whatsoever has been made from the house of the petitioner and the petitioner has been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64702 of 2025(3) dt.17-01-2026 2/2 implicated merely on account of the fact that he carries 8 criminal antecedents of similar nature.

5. learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and has submitted that the petitioner carries antecedents of similar nature and he should not be granted the liberty of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has long list of criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

8. In the event of his surrender before the learned court below, the court below shall consider the bail application on the same day without being prejudiced by the order passed by this Court.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) krishna/- U T