Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65278 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Aman Kumar S/o Arjun Sah Resident of Village - Fethpur Pakari, P.S - Mahua, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 145 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

As per prosecution case, the informant was robbed by four miscreants of his motorcycle, a mobile phone, Rs. 65,000/- cash and some documents.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 13-06-2025. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65278 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 2/3 5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused, namely, Niraj Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner was not even put on T.I.P. Save and except confessional statement of co-accused, there is no material against the petitioner. Other coaccused has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10-09-2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61489 of 2025.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, claim based on parity and manner of petitioner's implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 145 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65278 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T