Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48797/2017bail granted

Md. Safare Alam @ Safare Alam v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48797 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -137 Year- 2015 Thana -SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Md. Safare Alam @ Safare Alam son of Md. Gulam Ansari Resident of village - Lichi Fulwari, Sursant Uttari, P.S. Sursand, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Nasira Khatoon daughter of Late Islam and wife of Md. Safare Alam @ Safare Alam presently residing at village - Chakni, P.S. Sursand, District - Sitamarhi.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2017. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48797 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 2/2 been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the state and counsel for the complainant, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi, in connection with Complaint case No.CI-137 of 2015. (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T