← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74389/2023bail rejected

Dinesh Ram @ Dinesh Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-16Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74389 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2023 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Dinesh Ram @ Dinesh Kumar Ram Son Of Nagendra Ram Resident Of Village- Agauther Nanda, P.S.- Isuapur, Distt- Saran Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raushan Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 16-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 221 of 2023, lodged on 12.08.2023, under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B)/22/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the prosecution, recovery of 4 Kgs of Ganja from the possession of the petitioner has been the subject matter of the present case.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the said quantity of Ganja is much less than the commercial quantity but higher than the small quantity. Counsel further submits that there is two criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in both the cases he is on bail. Counsel submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74389 of 2023(5) dt.16-04-2024 2/2 that no such mistake shall take place in future.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that 4 Kgs of Ganja has been recovered from his possession.

6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew the prayer for bail six months after framing of the charge. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T