← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61172/2019dismissed

Mahamati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61172 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

MAHAMATI DEVI Wife of Late Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Bande Bishunpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, dist.- Vaishali. 2.

Suraj Singh Son of Late Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Bande Bishunpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 138/2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated merely because they happen to be the mother-in-law and husband respectively, of the deceased. It is submitted that the brother of the petitioner no. 2 has since filed a petition before the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hajipur narrating the circumstances in which a false case has been lodged owing to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61172 of 2019(2) dt.14-10-2019 2/2 the deceased side. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T