Anwar Sah @ Anwar Shah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66003 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Anwar Sah @ Anwar Shah Son of Noorain sah @ Nurain Shah Resident of village - Ahirauli Dubauli, Tola Takiya, Police Station - Gopalpur, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mrs. Tooba Hera, Advocate Mr. Pratyush, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-B)a, 26 of the Arms Act and Section 317 (3) of B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, one government pistol loaded with three live cartridges and one country made pistol were recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a false recovery of firearms has been shown from his house and he has also been falsely implicated in another under case under Section 109 of the B.N.S. in which he has been granted bail. It is further submitted that there are discrepancies in the seizure list as the same has not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66003 of 2025(6) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 been prepared in the presence of any independent witness and the petitioner is in custody 24.05.2025 and till date charges have not been framed.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition on the ground that a government pistol has also been recovered from his possession and in total there are seven criminal antecedent against the petitioner

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the recovery, coupled with the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. However, the petitioner is granted the liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) vashudha/- U T