Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Education Department, New Secret

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1833 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9074 of 2018 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Singh, Son of Vishwanath Singh, resident of Village- Sareya, P.O. and P.S. Bansghati, District- Deoriya (U.P.). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Education Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. Sri K.N.P. Verma, the Hon'ble Minister, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. Sri R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. Sri Ramayan Ram, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra.

5. Sri Akhileshwar Prasad, the District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

6. Sri Shailendra Kumar, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj.

7. Sri Binod Kumar Singh, the Block Education Officer, Bhore, Gopalganj. null null

8. Sri Sanjay Kumar Rai, I/c Headmaster, Middle School Sheorajpur, Anchal Bhore District Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Smt. Shilpa Singh - Ga 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 31-10-2018 Pursuant to the order dated 10.10.2018 the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran is personally present in Court.

Having regard to the fact that the order of this Court has been substantially complied with but the petitioner has made an issue on the basis of correspondence of the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran who was not required to take any cognizance of the order passed by the District Programme

Patna High Court MJC No.1833 of 2018(7) dt.31-10-2018 2/2 Officer (Estt.), Saran, the Regional Dy. Director of Education, Saran was asked to be present in Court. He has admitted that he has no direct concern with the implementation of the order in question. However, he has to be cautious in exercising his jurisdiction.

Considering the totality of the fact situation, the present contempt proceeding is dropped. Personal appearance of the Regional Dy. Director of Education, Saran is dispensed with. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner if he is otherwise aggrieved by implementation of the direction of this Court by approaching appropriate forum/court in accordance with law.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl./- U