Santosh Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48514 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2017 Thana -DHANSORI District- BUXAR ======================================================
1. Santosh Singh Son of Parsauti Singh
2. Manorama Devi Wifeof Santosh Singh, Daughter of Late Lal Jee Singh, Both Resident of Village-Saithu, Police Station-Rajpur, District-Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rahul Nath For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 98 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that petitioners are Nanad and Nandoi of the deceased. There is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners.
In the written report, it is alleged that co-accused Pawan Singh and Munna Singh caused injury to the deceased with knife. Petitioners are only alleged to be conspirators. The mother-in-law of the deceased with similar allegation has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 17-10-2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49049 of 2017 In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48514 of 2017 (3) dt.07-11-2017 2/2 allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 98 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Buxar subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T