Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66994/2023bail rejected

Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-19Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66994 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2023 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR S/O BHIM YADAV R/O VILLAGE- PUNADIH, P.SKAJRA, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-10-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kajra P.S. Case no. 83 of 2023 registered under sections 307, 379, 323, 354B, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is stated that over a dispute amongst the extended family members the petitioner gave a blow with a rod on the head of the informant leading to grievous injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the parties are agnates, the informant being the nephew(bhatija) of the petitioner. There is dispute over rasta. The petitioner is in custody since 21.6.2023 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66994 of 2023(2) dt.19-10-2023 2/2

5. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it transpires that there is an allegation against the petitioner of having given a blow with a rod on the head of the informant. From the injury report of the informant which is Annexure-2 to the petition it transpires that the allegations are substantiated in so far as fracture on the temporal region has been found and the injury has been opined to be grievous in nature.

7. Taking into consideration the allegations together with the injury report, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

8. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail on completing one year in custody or on framing of charge whichever is earlier.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T