← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68540/2023allowed

Rakshita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-29Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68540 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2022 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAKSHITA KUMARI D/O SHANKER PASWAN R/O VILLAGEHARDIYA, P.S- BAIKUNTHPUR, DISTT.- GOPALGANJ. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

THE INSPECTOR, VIGILANCE, DEPARTMENT, PATNA. BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra, APP.

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, petitioner is said to have obtained job on the post of Teacher on the basis of the forged documents.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and he has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. She has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. The petitioner joined the aforesaid school in the year 2012 on the basis of the certificate issued by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68540 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 BSEB. It is further submitted that the service of the petitioner was terminated by the concerned authority. This fact is not denied by learned counsel for the Vigilance Department. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the Vigilance Department opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the petitioner has been terminated from her service, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Siwaipatti P.S. Case No. 178 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T