← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16474/2022dismissed

Rubina Yasmin v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-13Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16474 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Rubina Yasmin Daughter of Md. Raisuddin, Resident of Village-Bathna, P.S.-Amdabad, District-Katihar.

2.

Md. Tajamul Hussain, son of Md. Sahjahan, Resident of Village-Bathna, P.S.-Amdabad, District-Katihar.

3.

Md. Aish Mohammad, son of Addul Malik, Resident of Village-Hal Baida, P.S.-Amdabad, District-Katihar.

4.

Md. Tamujuddin, son of Md. Ali, Resident of Village-Bathna, P.S.- Amdabad, District-Katihar.

5.

Md. Jamaluddin, son of Md. Nurul Haque, Resident of Village-Bathna, P.S.- Amdabad, District-Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Add. Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Katihar.

4.

The District Education Officer, Katihar.

5.

The Presiding Officer, District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Katihar.

6.

The Block Education Officer, Dandkhora Block, P.s.-Dandkhora, DistrictKatihar. 7.

Block Development Officer, Dandkhora, District-Katihar. 8.

Block Pramukh, Dandkhora Block, Distirct Katihar. 9.

The Panchayat Samitee Member, Block Dandkhora, District-Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw ( Gp 23 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 No one appears for the petitioners.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State has pointed out that the writ petition has been filed with a prayer

Patna High Court CWJC No.16474 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 to direct the Presiding Officer, District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Katihar, to decide the restoration case arising out of appeal which has been pending since 2019. This Court is not meant to over see day-to-day proceeding conducted by the appellate authority. The writ petition is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Shamshad/- Item No. 6 U