← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50474/2017dismissed

Bibi Shayra Bano @ Bibi Sayra v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50474 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2017 Thana -BHARGAWAN District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Bibi Shayra Bano @ Bibi Sayra, W/o Md. Iliyas, R/o Village- Rajbara, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 272 of 2017, arising out of Bhargama P.S.Case No. 84 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is named in the FIR and it appears that she disclosed that she had killed the deceased and threw the dead body on orchard and later on dead body was recovered from orchard. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that except statement of Md. Munna, who has stated that petitioner has confessed to him that she has killed the deceased, there is absolutely nothing against her and she is in custody since 18.5.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50474 of 2017 (3) dt.16-11-2017 2/2 Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that on the basis of self confession of petitioner the dead body was recovered.

Having heard both sides and in view of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, it appears from materials on record that case has been committed, as such, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of nine months. If trial is not concluded within the said period, petitioner may renew her prayer for bail before the court below, which shall be considered on the basis of materials available on record and he will pass appropriate order.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U