Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48682/2017bail granted

Mahendra Nonia @ Mahendra Noniya v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-18Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48682 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAINPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Mahendra Nonia @ Mahendra Noniya Son of Darbari Nonia, R/o Village- Muri, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Sunil For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Virendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2017 in connection with Chainapur P.S.Case no. 81 of 2017 registered under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.

Considering the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no specific overt act against the petitioner and since the main allegation is against co-accused Chandradeo Nonia and in view of other circumstances of the case and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, let, above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48682 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 C.J.M., Kaimur (Bhabua) in connection with Chainpur P.S.Case No. 81 of 2017, subject to following conditions: (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar offences till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) that the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(iv) that the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) singh/- U T