← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3683/2019disposed

Babloo Kumar Singh @ Bablu Kumar Singh, v. The State Of Bihar,

2023-06-19Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3683 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19866 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Babloo Kumar Singh @ Bablu Kumar Singh, Son of Late Chandrakant Singh, Resident of Village-Rampur Khajuria, Police Station-Dumariaghat, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

2.

Badri Raut, Son of Late Anchit Raut, Resident of Village-Rampur Khajuria, Police Station-Dumariaghat, District-East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, throug, Deepak Kumar, Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.

Deepak Kumar, The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 3.

Rajesh Kumar Sriwastava, Bihar State Religious Trust Board, through its Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

4.

Rajesh Kumar Sriwastava, The Secretary, Bihar State Religious Trust Board, Bihar, Patna.

5.

Raman Kumar, District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 6.

Upendra Sharma, The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari.

7.

Mahanth Ram Ratan Das, father name not known to the petitioners, at present Mahanth of Rampurwa Math of Hindu Deities, East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushkar Narain Shahi (Aag 6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 19-06-2023 None appears for the petitioner.

2. Perusal of the order dated 01.05.2017 passed in CWJC No. 19866 of 2016 the present contempt petition is not maintainable. If concerned authority has failed to decide the

Patna High Court MJC No.3683 of 2019(2) dt.19-06-2023 2/2 petitioners complaint he is at liberty to file writ petition seeking a direction to decide his complaint.

3. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding of present MJC No. 3683 of 2019 stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file writ petition.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Jitendra Kumar, J) abhishekkr/- U