Sampoorna Nand Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.185 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2688 of 2011 ====================================================== SAMPOORNA NAND TIWARY S/O LATE CHANDRA SHEKHAR TIWARY, R/O CHIRIYA BAZAR, SONEPUR, P.S. - SONEPUR, DISTRICT - SARAN, BIHAR AT PRESENT POSTED AS LECTURER GOVERNMENT AYODHAYA SHIV KUMARI AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SERETARY, null DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (MEDICAL EDUCATION FAMILY WELFARE AND INDIGENOUS MEDICINE), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECREATARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (MEDICAL EDUCATION FAMILY WELFARE AND INDIGENOUS MEDICINE), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA
3. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (MEDICAL EDUCATION FAMILY WELFARE AND INDIGENOUS MEDICINE), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECETARIAT, PATNA
4. DIRECTOR (INDIGENOUS MEDICINES), DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA
5. DR. MAHEDRA PRASAD SINGH S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AT PRESNT POSTED AS READER, DEPARTMENT OF DRAVYA GUNA, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, KADAMKUAN, PATNA - 800003
6. DR. VISHWANATH SHARMA S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, RETIRED READER, DEAPRTMENT OF DRAVAY GUNA, GOVERMENT AYURVDIC COLLEGE, KADAMKUAN, PATNA - 800003
7. DR. UMESH CHANDRA SINHA S/O PRESENTLY NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, READER, DEPARTMENT OF DRAVYAGUNA, GOVERNMENT AYODHYA SINGH KUMARI AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, BEGUSARAI, BIHAR.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, AC to AAG-IX ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-09-2018 I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel representing the respondents.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.185 of 2018(3) dt.12-09-2018 2/2 The petitioner seeks review of the judgment dated 08.09.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2688 of 2011.
On seeing the review application, I find that the grounds, which have been taken for review, are not good grounds. It appears that the petitioner wants re-hearing of the entire case in the garb of present review application. Learned counsel for the petitioner has attempted to persuade this Court that there are certain errors apparent on record. An error apparent on record is such error which can be seen at the very first sight and not on the basis of long reasoning and logic. I do not find any merit in this review application. This application is accordingly rejected.
Interlocutory Applications stand disposed of. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/Ragini U