Vinod Ray @ Vinod Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67861 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Vinod Ray @ Vinod Kumar Ray Son of Late Chandrika Ray Resident of Village -Sabalpur Chaharam PS -Sonepur, Dist- Saran 2.

Lali Ray @ Ranjit Ray Son of Kivi Ray @ Lagan Ray Resident of Village -Sabalpur Chaharam PS -Sonepur, Dist- Saran 3.

Sakntala Devi @ Shakuntala Devi wife of Sinod Ray @ Shinodh Ray Resident of Village -Sabalpur Chaharam PS -Sonepur, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Mr. Mr. Raj Narayan Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pronoti Singh- A.P.P.

Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Anjali Anand Mr. Bhanu Priya Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 103(1) BNS has been added later on and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67861 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 2/3 the petitioner no.1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner nos.2 and 3 are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.3 is a woman.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners next submits that Shailesh Ray had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.67428 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 07.10.2025. It is also submitted that while granting the privilege of anticipatory bail to Shailesh Ray, this Court had considered the case on merits and in detail.

5. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant does not oppose the said submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that Shailesh Ray has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the order dated 07.10.2025 in Cr. Misc. No.67428 of 2025, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67861 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 3/3 Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Saran at Chhapra in connection with Sonepur P. S. Case No.305 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T