Govind Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14611 of 2017 ====================================================== Govind Mahto, S/o Late Tulay Mahto, Resident of Ward No. 8, Ram Manohar Lohia Path, P.S. - Forbesganj, District - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Deptt. Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
3. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea at Purnea.
4. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Araria at Araria.
5. The Sub Divisional Officer-cum-Building Controller, Forbesganj at Forbesganj, Araria.
6. Anil Kumar Singh Son of Late Dayanand Singh resident of Hotel Jyoti, Forbesganj, District - Araria.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-10-2018 Heard the parties.
The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities, particularly, Respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 to compensate the petitioner for the losses suffered by him during demolition of the premises of Respondent No.6, situated at Hotel Jyoti, Forbesganj, DistrictAraria. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that against the order dated 03.02.2017, passed in Case No.07/2016-17, by the Sub-Divisional Officer-cum- Building Controller, the petitioner preferred appeal,but during pendency
Patna High Court CWJC No.14611 of 2017(2) dt.04-10-2018 2/2 of the appeal the shop in question has been demolished leading to huge loss to the petitioner.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforementioned.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U