Patna High CourtMJC/2037/2018disposed

Md. Sabih Salim v. The State Of Bihar Through R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department. And ORS

2019-02-06Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2037 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Sabih Salim Son of Late Md. Sulaiman, resident of Village Palasmani, Post Office, and Police Station- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department.

2. The L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga through Dr. Ajit Kr. Singh, its Registar.

3. Prof. S.K. Singh, Vice Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwarnagar, Darbhanga.

4. The B.N. Mandal University, Laloonagar, Madhepura, through Dr. Vishwanath Bibek its Registrar.

5. Dr. A.K. Rai, Vice- Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University Laloonagar, Madhepura.

6. Dr. Ram, Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University Laloonagar, Madhepura.

7. Md. Zamirul Alam, Principal, Nehru College, Shafquatnagar, Post- Office and Police- Station Bahadurganj, Kishanganj.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Najmul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh , GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2019 Heard the parties.

At the very outset, it is informed on behalf of B.N. Mandal University that amount of cheque dated 24.03.2017 has already been paid to the petitioner vide cheque no. 11687684941 dated 17.01.2019 and now all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed.

Although, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner tried to convince the court that still some dues of the petitioner are pending with the concerned University but I do not find any

Patna High Court MJC No.2037 of 2018(6) dt.06-02-2019 2/2 material to substantiate the aforesaid claim of the petitioner. Accordingly, it is obvious that order of this court has already been complied with and there is no need to keep this contempt petition pending.

Hence, this contempt petition stands disposed of. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) shahzad/- U