Md. Jaffir @ Md. Jafir Alam @ Md. Japheer @ Md. Jafeer @ Md. Jafeer Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63117 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2024 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Jaffir @ Md. Jafir Alam @ Md. Japheer @ Md. Jafeer @ Md. Jafeer Alam S/O Md. Alihasan Ajad @ Late Md. Ajad @ Md. Ajad @ Md. Ali Hasan R/O Village- Ward No. 13, Hulas, Bichari, P.S- Raghopur, Distt.- Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 283 of 2024 dated 17.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 103(1), 85 and read with 3(5) of the B.N.S and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that the petitioner and the co-accused persons have killed the sister of the informant for the non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 10 Lakh as dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63117 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 this case. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and there is no specific allegation of demand and torture against him while the petitioner being father-in-law was living separately since long. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 06.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10063 of 2025. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 283 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T