Babita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16453 of 2022 ====================================================== Babita Kumari W/o- Shri Shyam Nandan Mandal @ Shyam Nandan Kumar Resident of Milki, P.O.- Belthi Maheshpur Sameli, P.S.- Kurshela, Dist.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Pramandal, Purnea. 3.

The District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S.), Katihar. 4.

The Child Development Project Officer, (C.D.P.O.), Block- Sameli. 5.

Bijli Kumari, W/o Baidh Narain Mandal Resident of Belthi Maheshpur, P.S.- Kurshela, Dist.- Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha (GP-27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. (I) Issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the order of Divisional Commissioner, Purnea (Respondent No 2) dated 26.09.2022, passed in Revision Appeal (Anganbari) No 14 of 2021 whereby and whereunder Respondent No 3 (District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S) Katihar, passed in Appeal No 16 of 2018 dated 10.01.21 allowed in favour of the petitioner, rejected by the Respondent No 2 (Divisional Commissioner, Purnea, as the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16453 of 2022(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 petitioner is working on the post of Sevika Anganbari after due selection on 23.11.2017 (II) Issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus directing and commanding of writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing and commanding the respondent not to issue selection letter to Respondent No 5 (Bijli kumari) Village Panchayat Raj Muradpur Ward No 12 Block Sameli Aganbari Centre No 100 on the post of Anganbari Sevika."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U