Aman Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63530 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2022 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Aman Raj S/o Late Arjun Choudhary R/o- Malhipur Vishanpur, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 362 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 25.09.2022.
The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 36 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the dickey of the car. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that as petitioner refused to sign as a seizure list witness of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63530 of 2022(3) dt.09-12-2022 2/2 apprehended pick-up van loaded with illicit liquor, he was also implicated, in present case showing in his possession of 36 litres of illicit liquor. It is pointed out that the seizure list appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses rather by police constables. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as seizure list appears doubtful coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 362 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Exclusive Excise Court No. 2, Bhagalpur/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) pooja/- U T