Subodh Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63742 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2022 Thana- TISIAUTA District- Vaishali ====================================================== SUBODH RAY S/o Ramchandra Ray R/o Village- Mansurpur Maricha, P.S.- Mahua, Distt- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Pronoti Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 189.75 liters of liquor from a truck. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is next submitted that petitioner is a businessman and he was completely unaware that the driver of the vehicle would misuse the vehicle for such illegal purpose, it is next submitted that petitioner being owner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63742 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 came to be implicated, it is further submitted that no prudent businessman would indulge in committing a crime by using his own vehicle and thus create evidence against himself. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 104 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T