← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63233/2022bail granted

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-11Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63233 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2021 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vishal Kumar S/o Dharmendra Yadav @ Dharmendra Chaudhari R/o villageBangara, P.S.- Barhariya Distt- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 05.01.2022, in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 244 of 2021, F.I.R. dated 06.12.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of self confessional statement

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63233 of 2022(3) dt.11-04-2023 2/3 of the petitioner which was recorded in Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 930 of 2021. He further submits that except the confessional statement of the petitioner, no other cogent material has come during investigation against the petitioner and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2022.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner carries two more cases other than the present one.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 244 of 2021, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63233 of 2022(3) dt.11-04-2023 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T