← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64692/2025dismissed

Arvind Yadav @ Arvind Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-17Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64692 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2025 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Arvind Yadav @ Arvind Prasad S/O Late Laldev Yadav Resident of VillageSukhdev Bigha, P.S.- Kako, Dist.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nityanand Neeraj For the State :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 27 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303, 109, 308(3), 117(2), 74, 352, 351(2) of BNS.

3. According to allegation, the petitioner and his son Chandan Kumar badly assaulted the informant with iron rod. Three days prior to the occurrence also, they assaulted the informant and outraged the modesty of the female members.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. It is further submitted that there is land dispute between the parties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64692 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 and there is case and counter case between them.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the injury suffered by the informant is grievous in nature and the petitioner has two criminal antecedent.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, it is rejected.

8. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below and seeks regular bail, which shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T