M/S Ashok Electricals, Nirmali, District Supaul Through Its Sole Proprietor Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Anjani Kumar Singh Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.492 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16889 of 2017 ====================================================== M/s Ashok Electricals, Nirmali, District Supaul Through Its Sole Proprietor Ashok Kumar S/o Sri Subo Narayan Shah Resident of VillageNirmali, P.S. Niramli, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Anjani Kumar Singh Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. Baidyanath Yadav Son of not known to the petitioner posted District Magistrate, Supaul.

3. Dinesh Lal Das Son of not known to the Petitioner, Deputy Electoral Officer, Supual.

4. Braj Kishore Lal Son of not known to the Petitioner, District Panchayat Raj Officer, Supaul.

5. Arun Kumar Singh Son of not known to the Petitioner Sub-Divisional Officer, Nirmali,Supaul.

6. Manoj Kumar Son of not known to the Petitioner Block Development Officer, Raghopur, Supaul.

7. Birendra Kumar Son of known to the Petitioner Block Development Officer, Saraigarh, Supaul.

... ... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha - GA 7 Mr.Abhishek Singh, AC to GA 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the judgment of this Court dated 30.11.2017 passed in CWJC No. 16889 of 2017.

Patna High Court MJC No.492 of 2018 dt.12-12-2018 2/2

3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of OP Nos. 2 to 7 Annexure-D whereof being an order dated 30.08.2018 discloses that a final decision has been taken by the authorities and thus it is submitted that the order of this Court stands complied with.

4. In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 492 of 2018 stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case it is aggrieved by the order of the authorities as noticed above, it may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.12.2018 Transmission Date NA