← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2265/2018disposed

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna And ORS

2019-01-02Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2265 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16601 of 2016 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar, son of Sri Ramswarup Prasad, resident of Flat No. 102/A, Prince Apartment, Ashiyana Nagar, Magistrate Colony, P.S. - Rajiv Nagar, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Amir Subhani, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sinha, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Additional Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. K.S. Dwibedi, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

5. Mr. Pankaj Darad, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Zone, Darbhanga.

6. Mr. Binod Kumar-II, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Range, Darbhanga.

7. Mr. Deepak Varnwal, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

8. Mr. Sumit Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Jaynagar.

9. Mr. Sanjay Bharti, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Enquiry Officer cum Deputy Superintendent of Police (Headquarter) Madhubani.

10. Mr. Paras Nath, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Inspector General of Police, ATS, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Ranjan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Parth Sarthy - Ga 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 02-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

That the consequential benefits arising from the order has been paid, any other grievance that may be subsisting, the petitioner would be entitled to raise the same before the authority concerned, who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

Patna High Court MJC No.2265 of 2018(3) dt.02-01-2019 2/2 With the observation above, the contempt application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Surendra/- U