Rinku Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51086 of 2017 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-261 Year-2017 Thana- GAYA MUFFSIL District- Gaya ===============================================

1. Rinku Kumar, Son of Late Ram Pravesh Singh, Resident of Mohalla near Shyam Takij, P.S.-Moffasil, District-Gaya.

2. Dilip Kumar, Son of Ram Ekbal Singh, Resident of VillageAbakuan, P.S.-Tekari, District-Gaya.

3. Amit Kumar, Son of Rabindra Singh, Resident of Village, Laharappa, P.S.-Agiawan, District-Ara.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s =============================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP. =============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences under Sections 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 152 litres of country made liquor was recovered from the joint house of the petitioners and one Pintu Singh. Petitioners claim that they are having clean antecedent and are in custody since 31.08.2017. Considering the facts and the circumstances of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51086 of 2017(2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 case, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Moffasil P.S. Case No. 261 of 2017 with a condition that if the petitioners, after their release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Vikash/- U T