Pramod Kumar Singh @ Pramod Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52173 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2016 Thana -ANGARGHAT District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Pramod Kumar Singh @ Pramod Singh S/o Ram Sagar Singh resident of Village - Rampur Shamthu, P.S. - Angarghat, District - Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar Karan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 07.09.2017 in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/149/341/323/324/307/379/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and the injuries purported to have been inflicted by the petitioner is said to be simple in nature.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52173 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur, in connection with Angarghat P.S. Case No. 56/2016, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T