Moghis Hashmi v. The Central Board Of Secondary Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19017 of 2019 ====================================================== Moghis Hashmi S/o Masiur Rahman Resident of Mohalla- Bazidpur, Near Masjid, P.o.- Barh, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Central Board of Secondary Education through the Chairperson-cumChief Secretary of the Board, Siksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092 2.

The Secretary-cum-Chief Administrative Officer Central Board of Secondary Education (Head Office), Siksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092 3.

The Regional Officer Central Board of Secondary Examination, Ambika Complex, Behind State Bank Colony, Near Brahmsthan, Sheikhpura, Raza Bazar, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar, Pin-800014 4.

The Principal Mount Litera Zee High School, Kaiya, Nawada Road, Gaya, Bihar, Pin-823003 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Ravish, Advocate Mr. Kashyap Kaushal, Advocate For the C.B.S.E.

:

Mr. Vinay Krishna Tripathy, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 13-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as C.B.S.E. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is innocent typographical error in the spelling of the name of father of the petitioners and for correction of the same. Petitioner has approached the C.B.S.E. but the C.B.S.E. has not corrected the record on the ground of delay.

Mr. Vinay Krishna Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of C.B.S.E. submits that time is the essence in the

Patna High Court CWJC No.19017 of 2019(2) dt.13-09-2019 2/2 matter of correction and after expiry of the time the C.B.S.E. has no difficulty in making correction in the record. After considering the rival contention, the Court find that the correction sought for by the petitioner in the present application is very innocent error i.e. instead of 'Masiur Rahman' it was wrongly typed as 'Mastur Rahman'. Such innocent typographical error is not going to change the record materially. Under the aforesaid circumstance, the Court directs the C.B.S.E. to carry that correction at the earliest. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U