← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50511/2017bail granted

Prince Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-10-17Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50511 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhepura ====================================================== Prince Kumar S/o Sikandar Yadav, R/o village Belahi, P.S. Bihra, District Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State Of Bihar

2. Rambha Devi w/o Prince Kumar, D/o Kamleshwari Yadav, permanent resident of village Belahi, P.S. Bihra, District Saharsa, at present residing in village Bhgawani, P.S. Ghailad, District Madhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shiva Shankar Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Smt. Pronati Singh, APP For opposite party No.2 :

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 316, 498A, 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and assault upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50511 of 2017(2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 petty family dispute. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Mahila) P.S. case No.42 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T