Siyaram Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63217 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2025 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Siyaram Paswan Son of Late Mahadeo Paswan R/O Village - Chanhat, P.S.- Haspura, District - Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Nitee Ranjan, Advocate Ms. Manisha Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard Mr. Ritwik Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nitee Ranjan, learned counsel for the informant and Ms. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 77 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 103(1), 76 and 303(2) of the B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution is that altogether 33 persons named in the F.I.R. have assaulted the family members of the informant due to which one Chandradeep Bhagat died.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63217 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 case. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. it is clear that the petitioner is only a member of mob. No allegation of any overt act is against him. There are 33 accused persons in this case and specific allegation is not against this petitioner. Petitioner is aged about 65 years and he is in judicial custody since 17.03.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the application for bail. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that as per F.I.R. there is allegation that all the accused persons assaulted.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 77 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T