Patna High CourtMJC/2590/2018disposed

Sima Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-02Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2590 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3149 of 2018 ====================================================== Sima Kumari D/o Late Ram Nagina Sinha, Wife of Shri Amarendra Kumar Singh, Resident of Village-Mirzapur, Post Office Mirzapur (Khurd Lauwa), Police Station- Janta Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra. At present posted and working as Prakhand Teacher in Govt. Middle School Lahladpur, BlockLahladpur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Mr. R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Binay Kumar Verma, The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Subrat Kumar Jain, The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

5. Mr. Jaichand Prasad Srivastava, The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra.

6. Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh, The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran at Chapra.

7. Mr. Anil Singh, The Prakhand Pramukh-cum-the Chairman of Prakhand Teacher Selection Committee, Prakhand-Lahladpur, Block-Lahladpur, District-Saran at Chapra.

8. Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, The Block Development Officer-cum-Member Secretary of Prakhand Teacher Selection Committee, Block-Lahladpur, District-Saran at Chapra.

9. Mr. Mithilesh Prasad, The Block Education Officer, Lahladpur, District Saran at Chapra.

10. Ms. Tara Kumari, The Drawing Disbursing-cum-Headmaster of Govt. Middle School Lahladpur, Block-Lahladpur, District Saran at Chapra. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - Aag 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Considering the fact that the order of the writ court has been complied with, no further indulgence is required. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law, if he is aggrieved. With the aforesaid, the present application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U