← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1747/2023disposed

Jairam Mahto v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Health Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2025-08-04Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1747 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2020 Thana- KISHANPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Jairam Mahto Son Of Late Manichand Mahto Resident Of Mohallah - Balughat, Road No.2, P.S. - Town, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Health Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.

Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Patna, Bihar Bihar 3.

Director, Regional Forensic Science, Laboratory, Bhagalpur Bhagalpur 4.

Registrat, Civil Court, Supaul, District - Supaul Supaul 5.

S.H.O., Kishanpur P.S., District - Supaul Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kamlesh Kishore AC to SC 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other writ or writs, direction or direction, commanding upon the respondents to issue a copy of DNA report regarding Bambam Mahto, the Son of the petitioner who was killed by the accused persons regarding which Kishanpur P.S Case No. 317/20 dated 31.12.20 was registered by Officer-in-charge, Kishanpur P.S, District-Supaul as the said report is required to be filed in LIC Branch Office, Imphal, Manipur for getting claim Insurance Amount.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1747 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/2

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the insurance claim, the copy of the DNA report is being required by the Insurance Company, therefore, he may be supplied the copy of the DNA report.

4. The learned counsel for the State has brought on record the DNA report which is annexed as Annexure-A to the counter affidavit.

5. In these circumstances, this application has become infructuous and stands disposed of as the copy of the DNA report has already been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner in Court as an Annexure-A to the counter affidavit.

6. If the petitioner files a copy of the DNA report supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the LIC will settle the insurance claim of the petitioner in accordance with law within one month of its submission.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T