Ajit Chandrawanshi @ Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68944 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2022 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Ajit Chandrawanshi @ Ajit Kumar S/o Late Baidhnath Chandrawanshi @ Baijnath Singh R/o vill - Munshi Bigha, P.S. - Aurangabad Mufasil, Distt. - Aurangabad (Bihar) 2.
Rakesh Chandrawanshi @ Rakesh Kumar S/o Sunil Chandrawanshi R/o vill - Munshi Bigha, P.S. - Aurangabad Mufasil, Distt. - Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Aurangabad Mufassil P.S. Case no. 136 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506, 308 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution is that is that these petitioners along with others abused and assaulted the informant. It is further alleged that co-accused Dhiraj Chandrawanshi stabbed him due to which he sustained injury.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68944 of 2024(2) dt.18-10-2024 2/3
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is no specific overt act of assaulting against the petitioners rather the specific allegation of stabbing upon the informant is against co-accused Dhiraj Chandrawanshi. There is case and counter case between the parties. From perusal of the impugned order, it is mentioned that the nature of injury is simple as opined by the doctor.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Aurangabad Mufassil P.S. Case no. 136 of 2022, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each of them with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad (Bihar) subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68944 of 2024(2) dt.18-10-2024 3/3 conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T