Jai Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48428 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2015 Thana -JADIA District- SUPAUL ======================================================
1. Jai Krishna Kumar, son of Shivan Yadav @ Shiv Narayan Yadav, resident of Village- Laharniyan, Police Station- Tribeniganj, DistrictSupaul. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 16-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 449, 326, 307, 120B/34 Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that there is only suspicion against the Petitioner, who has fair antecedents, it is ordered that in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioner, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Jadia P.S. Case No.26 of 2015, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48428 of 2015 (2) dt.16-10-2015 2/3 the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner.
The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the Petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
However, if it is found that the Petitioner is
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48428 of 2015 (2) dt.16-10-2015 3/3 tampering with the prosecution evidence, appropriate steps shall be against him for cancelling the bail bond of the Petitioner. (Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T