← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66556/2023allowed

Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-31Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66556 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2018 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Rahul Singh Son Of Dhumal Singh @ Dharmendra Singh Resident Of Village - Nayaka Barka Baiju Tola, P.S. - Rivilganj, District - Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 188, 353, 427, 431, 283 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Public Property Damage Act.

3. Allegedly, accused persons had obstructed movement of vehicular traffic on N.H. 19, while supporting a call for Bharat Bandh. They are said to have obstructed the police in discharging of their official duties and damaged public and private properties.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that there is general and omnibus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66556 of 2023(2) dt.31-10-2023 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.03.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17660 of 2019. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 103 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T