← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15324/2023dismiss for nonprosecution

Ram Vilash Prasad Singh @ Ram Bilash Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-28Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15324 of 2023 ====================================================== Ram Vilash Prasad Singh @ Ram Bilash Prasad Singh S/o Late Ishwar Mahto @ Ishavr Prasad Kevai, Resident of Village-Kewai, (Jaitipur), P.S. Chandi, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, Biharsharif, Nalanda.

3.

The Additional Collector (Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna). 4.

The Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. 5.

The Circle Officer, Noor Sarai, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. 6.

Ramakant Prasad Mahto, son of Late Murat Prasad, resident of VilalgeKoklak Chak, P.S.-Noor Sarai, District-Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 28-04-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for writ, writ(s), order, order(s), direction, direction(s) for quashing the order dated 19.08.2015 passed in Mutation Appeal No. 12/2015-16 by the learned court of Deputy Collector Land Reform, Bihar Sharif. Patna whereby and where under the learned court was

Patna High Court CWJC No.15324 of 2023(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2 pleased to quash the order dated 26.03.2015 passed in Mutation Case No. 1441/2014-15 and to grant any other relief / reliefs on which petitioner may found entitled in accordance with law."

3. Learned State counsel submits that against the order passed by the D.C.L.R., Bihar Sharif, Nalanda, the petitioner has remedy before the Collector/Additional Collector of the district.

4. He further has taken this Court to order to show that it has been passed on 19.08.2015 but the writ petition has been filed eight years later in the year 2023.

5. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Collector/Additional Collector of the district.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U