← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17537/2018dismissed

Hasibur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-03-18Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17537 of 2018 ====================================================== Hasibur Rahman Son of Late Shahabuddin, Resident of Village- Paharia, P.O. and P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnia.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, 5- Vidhapati Marg, Patna. 4.

The Chairman, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, 5- Vidhapati Marg, Patna.

5.

The Secretary, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, 5- Vidhapati Marg, Patna.

6.

The District Education Officer, Purnia.

7.

Abdus Salam, Son of Late Abdus Samad, Resident of Village- Paharia, P.O. and P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnia.

8.

The Appellate Authority, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S. M. Ehtesham For the State :

Mr. Apurva Kumar, Advocate For the Madarsa Board :

Mr. Shahzad Hassan Khan, Advocate.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 11.6.2018 passed by the Special Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, by which the earlier Managing Committee was dissolved, has been reinstated. I have been informed by learned counsel for the Madarsa Board that the tenure of the Managing Committee is of

Patna High Court CWJC No.17537 of 2018(7) dt.18-03-2023 2/2 three years. Since the orders passed by the Appellate Authority reinstating the previous Managing Committee is of 2018 and the terms of three years has already been passed, no relief can be granted to the petitioner at this stage and, therefore, I find that the present writ application has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U