Pintu Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52577 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -282 Year- 2017 Thana -DIGHA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Pintu Kumar.
2. Chintu Kumar, both sons of late Suresh @ Suresh Rai, resident of Pati Pul, Digha Ghat, P.S.- Digha, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners who are languishing in judicial custody since 06.09.2017 seek bail in connection with Digha P.S. Case No.282 of 2017 for offences punishable under Sections 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 114, 115, 342, 323, 307, 353, 395, 397, 186, 332, 333, 336, 337, 338, 427, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52577 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/3 Circle Officer, is that while he had gone along with police constable and police party for measuring of land several persons more than 1000 in number became violent and started obstruction of government work and also resorted to snatching arms, mobile phones of the officials and blocking roads. Police resorted to firing and large number of persons and police persons were injured. As many as 132 persons including the petitioners have been named in the F.I.R. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are innocent, bear no criminal history and general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the violent mob and the petitioners are alleged to be one of them. He submits that no specific allegation has been levelled against them and that chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering of the prosecution witnesses by the petitioner. However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52577 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna in connection with Digha P.S. Case No. 282 of 2017. (Nilu Agrawal, J) Devendra/- U T