Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69794 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2023 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

VICKY KUMAR SON OF SAHEB TIWARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGEWARD NO. 3, KANTI KASWA, PS- KANTI, DIST- MUZAFFARPUR 2.

VIKASH KUMAR SON OF SAHEB TIWARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGEWARD NO. 3, KANTI KASWA, PS- KANTI, DIST- MUZAFFARPUR 3.

BITTU KUMAR @ RAHUL KUMAR @ RAHUL SON OF MANOJ RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- WARD NO. 3, KANTI KASWA, PS- KANTI, DIST- MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-02-2024 Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In view of the order dated 07.11.2023, this application survives only for petitioner nos.1 and 2.

3. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

4. Petitioners along with other co-accused are said to have abducted the daughter of the informant.

5. In compliance of the order dated 29.01.2024, the Investigating Officer of the present case is present before the Court. He submits that the victim girl has been recovered from Deoria along with one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69794 of 2023(4) dt.05-02-2024 2/2 Pankaj Kumar.

6. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

7. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the victim girl has been recovered with one Pankaj Kumar, let the above named petitioner nos.1 and 2, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 56 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

9. The personal appearance of the Investigating Officer is dispensed with.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T