← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8986/2016disposed

Guriya Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-06Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8986 of 2016 ====================================================== Guriya Kumari W/o Dhanjee Paswan, Resident of village- Rawatiya, P.O.- Nachap, P.S.- Murar, District- Buxar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Patna

2. The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna

3. The Deputy Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Welfare Department at the office of Divisional Commissioner, Patna

4. The Collector, District Buxar at Buxar

5. The District Programme Officer at Buxar

6. The Child Development Programme Officer, Chuagai, Kesatt, DistrictBuxar

7. Anu Kumari, W/o Bikrama Prasad, Resident of village- Rawatiya, P.O.- Nachap, P.S.- Murar, District- Buxar .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajit Pratap Singh, SC 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 06-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner questions the appointment of the private respondent to the post of Aaganbari Sevika, Centre Code No. 75, Village - Rawatiya, Panchayat - Nachap, Ward No. 5, BlockChaugai, District- Buxar. According to the petitioner, the wife of the 'Devar' of the private respondent was drawing salary as a Panchayat Teacher at Rs. 6600/- per month and thus she was disqualified for appointment.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8986 of 2016 (2) dt.06-08-2018 Even though the guidelines prescribe forum for raising complaint on selection before the District Programme Officer but the petitioner has rushed to this Court without raising any such grievance. There are statutory guidelines regulating the appointment of Aaganwari Sevika and which provide forum to look into the complaints arising from the selection process but the petitioner has failed to exhaust the same.

Let the petitioner avail of the remedy so available to him under the guidelines. No cause for indulgence is made out at the present stage.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Archana/Surendra U