Ramashish Kumar @ Sukul Sao @ Sukul Saw v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67861 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- JHAJHA RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Ramashish Kumar @ Sukul Sao @ Sukul Saw Son of Late Kailash Prasad @ Kailash Sao Permanent address - Village - Kali Pahari, P.S. - Kavaiya, Distt. - Lakhisarai, Current address - Vidya Nagar, Colony Harmu, Aditya Marriage Hall 1966/G4 H/A, Doranda, P.S. - Doranda, Distt.- Ranchi, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2024 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest connection with Rail Jhajha P.S. Case No. 92 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 31.03.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused person were involved in printing of fake currency and they are multi millionaires by way of their act of forgery, cheating and loot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67861 of 2023(4) dt.05-03-2024 2/2 present case . He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.
5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, on the basis of material available on record as well as case diary opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the learned Court below has issued the process under Section 82 of the Cr. P.C. on 14.06.2023 and hence the anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable.
6. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner on that score alone. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed as not maintainable (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T