Mini Devi v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51135 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51135 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -158 Year- 2017 Thana -BARAULI District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================
1. Mini Devi, Wife of Rajendra Ojha, Resident of Village-Mohammadpur, Nirmal Tola, P.S.-Barauli (Madhoupur O.P.), District-Gopalganj, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 158 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and others is of assaulting the son of informant resulting his death. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that an F.I.R has been lodged by the petitioner side also, in which, it has been stated that deceased entered into the house of the petitioner for committing theft but he was caught and assaulted, thereafter, petitioner and others took him to hospital, where he died. Further submission is that petitioner is a lady and has been in judicial custody since 20.08.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and as petitioner is a lady, she is
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51135 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 158 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T