← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15930/2015disposed

Hardeo Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-24Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15930 of 2015 =========================================================== Hardeo Prasad Singh Son of Late Jaggan Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Babu Chakla, P.O. Mahaddipur, P.S. Parbatta, (Pasraha) District Khagaria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Under Secretary to the Government of Bihar, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna

3. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna

4. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna

5. The District Education Officer, Khagaria

6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Khagaria

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Maheshkhut, Parbatta Khagaria

8. The Headmaster, Middle School Tehay, Parbatta, Khagaria. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the State and the Accountant General.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis of counter affidavit filed, submitted that admitted dues have been paid. However, he submitted that similarly situated persons have been paid much more what has been paid to the petitioner and it appears that there is some error in calculation.

3. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with

Patna High Court CWJC No.15930 of 2015 dt.24-05-2017 2/2 liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondent no. 5 pointing out as to how the calculation made by the respondents is incorrect and also disclosing how he has calculated the dues payable to him. He shall also be at liberty to draw similarities between payments made to similarly situated persons.

4. If such a representation is filed within one month from today along with a copy of this order, the same shall be looked into and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, a reasoned order shall be passed within three weeks of such representation being filed. If it is found that further payment is due to the petitioner, the same shall also be paid to him within the next three weeks. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U