Amar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26117 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2014 Thana -KAHALGAON District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Amar Mahto, son of Chhotelal Mahto, resident of village- Maheshamunda, P.S.- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Suresh Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2015 The petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.03.2015 in connection with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 49 of 2014 for the offences instituted under Sections 325, 307/34 of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioner alongwith two others made demand of ransom amount from the informant and on protest being made, the petitioner threw bomb on the informant causing him injury.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 12.03.2015 and the charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. It has further been submitted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26117 of 2015 (2) dt.28-07-2015 2/2 that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. As per allegation, it is submitted that the petitioner has caused injury due to explosive substance. It is further submitted that the occurrence is said to have taken place on 22.01.2014 but the fardbeyan was recorded on 26.01.2014. It is further submitted that the petitioner may be released on bail after completion of six months in custody i.e., from 12.03.2015.

On behalf of the State and the informant it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and the injury report corroborates the allegation made in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail after completion of six months in custody i.e., from 12.03.2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur, in connection with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 49 of 2014. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T